Jak cię złapią, to znaczy, że oszukiwałeś. Jak nie, to znaczy, że posłużyłeś się odpowiednią taktyką.
g., Hulstijn 1992; Laufer & Girsai, 2008; Prince,
1996). Testing both passive and active vocabulary knowledge, Walters and Bozkurt (2009) found that ELLs who kept a vocabulary notebook learned significantly more vocabulary than similar learners in a control TEACHING ISSUES 365 group that did not. Perhaps more important, ELLs who kept a vocabulary notebook then demonstrated a greater tendency to use the target words in freewriting compositions. When my ELLs do freewriting, I require them to use and underline two vocabulary items in their writing. Students must use one word that we recently studied and one unknown word from their dictionary or other source. I grade these short homework assignments based on the inclusion of the two underlined words (100), only one underlined word (50), or no underlined words (0). This activity challenges the status quo in which our ELLs continue to make do with the limited vocabulary they know and therefore never expand their lexical base. This simple assignment requires ELLs to push their lexical limits. It also gets them more accustomed to taking responsibility for their vocabulary growth. SUMMARY Second language vocabulary research has given us better information on which words to teach as well as how to teach them. We also have more information about how people learn vocabulary, and this information can inform the design of classroom activities, books, and software for vocabulary. Despite this growing information, many questions are still unresolved, such as, Is there an ideal number of words to be learned in one lesson? How can vocabulary best be presented in textbooks to optimize learning? Should vocabulary be given more attention in curricula than grammar? What connections are there between grammar and vocabulary? Vocabulary is perhaps the most crucial component in learning a foreign language. Wilkins (1972) summarizes the situation best with ‘‘While without grammar very little can be conveyed, without vocabulary nothing can be conveyed’’ (p. 111). The field of TESOL has seen much valuable lexical research in recent years, so practitioners are hopeful that this line of classroom-based research will continue to inform teachers, curriculum planners, and materials writers in order to improve second language vocabulary acquisition and the learning of English. THE AUTHOR Keith Folse is Professor of TESOL at the University of Central Florida, in the United States, where he trains undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral students in teaching ESL. He is the author of many textbooks on language learning and is especially interested in vocabulary. 366 TESOL QUARTERLY REFERENCES Chang, A. (2007). The impact of vocabulary preparation on L2 listening comprehension, confidence and strategy use. System, 35, 534–550. doi:10.1016/ j.system.2007.03.001. Cobb, T. (1999). Breadth and depth of lexical acquisition with hands-on concordancing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12, 345–360. doi:10.1076/ call.12.4.345.5699. Cobb, T. (2008). Commentary: Response to McQuillan and Krashen. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 109–114. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238. doi:10.2307/3587951. Davies, M. (2011). Corpus of contemporary American English. Retrieved February 1, 2011, from http://corpus.byu.edu/ Ellis, N., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 375–396. Engber, C. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 139–155. doi:10.1016/1060- 3743(95)90004-7. Ferris, D. (1994). Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 414–420. doi:10.2307/ 3587446. Folse, K. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying research to second language classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Folse, K. (2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 273–293. doi:10.2307/40264523. Folse, K. (2009). Research on vocabulary learning strategies: Applications for English language teachers. In R. Courchene & H. McGarrell (Eds.), Special Research Symposium Issue of ESL Ontario’s Contact, 34(2), 8–19. Folse, K. (2010). Is explicit vocabulary focus the reading teacher’s job? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 139–160. Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus- based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 339–359. Hedgcock, J., & Ferris, D. (2009). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts. New York, NY: Routledge. Hulstijn, J. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in
|
Wątki
|