Jak cię złapią, to znaczy, że oszukiwałeś. Jak nie, to znaczy, że posłużyłeś się odpowiednią taktyką.
serif Glyphs of serif fonts, as the term is used in CSS, have finishing strokes, flared or tapering ends, or have actual serifed endings (including slab serifs). Serif fonts are typically proportionately-spaced. They often display a greater variation between thick and thin strokes than fonts from the ’sans-serif’ generic font family. CSS uses the term ’serif’ to apply to a font for any script, although other names may be more familiar for particular scripts, such as Mincho (Japanese), Sung or Song (Chinese), Totum or Kodig (Korean). Any font that is so described may be used to represent the generic ’serif’ family. Examples of fonts that fit this description include: Times New Roman, Bodoni, Garamond, Minion Web, ITC Latin fonts Stone Serif, MS Georgia, Bitstream Cyberbit Greek fonts Bitstream Cyberbit Adobe Minion Cyrillic, Excelcior Cyrillic Upright, Monotype Cyrillic fonts Albion 70, Bitstream Cyberbit, ER Bukinst Hebrew New Peninim, Raanana, Bitstream Cyberbit fonts Japanese Ryumin Light-KL, Kyokasho ICA, Futo Min A101 fonts Arabic fonts Bitstream Cyberbit Cherokee Lo Cicero Cherokee fonts sans-serif Glyphs in sans-serif fonts, as the term is used in CSS, have stroke endings that are plain -- without any flaring, cross stroke, or other ornamentation. Sans-serif fonts are typically proportionately-spaced. They often have little variation between thick and thin strokes, compared to fonts from the ’serif’ family. CSS uses the term ’sans-serif’ to apply to a font for any script, although other names may be more familiar for particular scripts, such as Gothic (Japanese), Kai (Chinese), or Pathang (Korean). Any font that is so described may be used to represent the generic ’sans-serif’ family. Examples of fonts that fit this description include: 210 MS Trebuchet, ITC Avant Garde Gothic, MS Arial, MS Latin fonts Verdana, Univers, Futura, ITC Stone Sans, Gill Sans, Akzi- denz Grotesk, Helvetica Attika, Typiko New Era, MS Tahoma, Monotype Gill Sans 571, Greek fonts Helvetica Greek Cyrillic Helvetica Cyrillic, ER Univers, Lucida Sans Unicode, Bastion fonts Hebrew Arial Hebrew, MS Tahoma fonts Japanese Shin Go, Heisei Kaku Gothic W5 fonts Arabic fonts MS Tahoma cursive Glyphs in cursive fonts, as the term is used in CSS, generally have either joining strokes or other cursive characteristics beyond those of italic typefaces. The glyphs are partially or completely connected, and the result looks more like hand-written pen or brush writing than printed letterwork. Fonts for some scripts, such as Arabic, are almost always cursive. CSS uses the term ’cursive’ to apply to a font for any script, although other names such as Chancery, Brush, Swing and Script are also used in font names. Examples of fonts that fit this description include: Caflisch Script, Adobe Poetica, Sanvito, Ex Ponto, Snell Latin fonts Roundhand, Zapf-Chancery Cyrillic ER Architekt fonts Hebrew Corsiva fonts Arabic DecoType Naskh, Monotype Urdu 507 fonts fantasy Fantasy fonts, as used in CSS, are primarily decorative while still containing representations of characters (as opposed to Pi or Picture fonts, which do not represent characters). Examples include: Latin fonts Alpha Geometrique, Critter, Cottonwood, FB Reactor, Studz 211 monospace The sole criterion of a monospace font is that all glyphs have the same fixed width. (This can make some scripts, such as Arabic, look most peculiar.) The effect is similar to a manual typewriter, and is often used to set samples of computer code. Examples of fonts which fit this description include: Latin fonts Courier, MS Courier New, Prestige, Everson Mono Greek Fonts MS Courier New, Everson Mono Cyrillic fonts ER Kurier, Everson Mono Japanese fonts Osaka Monospaced Cherokee fonts Everson Mono 15.3 Font selection The second phase of the CSS2 font mechanism concerns the user agent’s selection of a font based on author-specified font properties, available fonts, etc. The details of the font matching algorithm [p. 231] are provided below. There are four possible font selection actions: name matching, intelligent matching, synthesis, and download. font name matching In this case, the user agent uses an existing, accessible font that has the same family name as the requested font. (Note that the appearance and the metrics might not necessarily match, if the font that the document author used and the font on the client system are from different foundries). The matching information is restricted to the CSS font properties, including the family name. This is the only method used by CSS1. intelligent font matching In this case, the user agent uses an existing, accessible font that is the closest match in appearance to the requested font. (Note that the metrics might not match exactly). The matching information includes information about the kind of font (text or symbol), nature of serifs, weight, cap height, x height, ascent, descent, slant, etc. font synthesis In this case, the user agent creates a font that is not only a close match in appearance, but also matches the metrics of the requested font. The synthesizing information includes the matching information and typically requires more accurate values for the parameters than are used for some matching schemes. In particular, synthesis requires accurate width metrics and character to glyph substitution and position information if all the layout characteristics of the specified font are to be preserved. font download
|
Wątki
|